<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Noagenda &#187; admin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noagenda.org/author/admin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noagenda.org</link>
	<description>U.S. policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>United States is going to defend Central Asia</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.<br />
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of foreign countries.</p>
<p>According to the preliminary plan, in each of the countries of Central Asia will be deployed unit 3rd Special Forces Group USA, which is based in North Carolina.</p>
<p>&#8220;3rd Special Forces Group will continue to carry out operations in Afghanistan and will be ready to provide assistance in training military personnel of Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, as requested by the head of U.S. Central Command,&#8221; &#8211; said in an interview with EurasiaNet, representative of the command Special Forces Lieutenant Commander Fred Kübler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton believes in the existence of a conspiracy against Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/bill-clinton-believes-in-the-existence-of-a-conspiracy-against-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/bill-clinton-believes-in-the-existence-of-a-conspiracy-against-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are trying to make &#8220;Maidan&#8221;
Bill Clinton about the Republicans, conspiracy and the U.S. budget.
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton believes that the Republican Party, at the moment is away from power, trying to hinder the work of the current president of the United States Barack Obama. In his Internet blog Clinton called this process &#8220;right-wing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are trying to make &#8220;Maidan&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill Clinton about the Republicans, conspiracy and the U.S. budget.</p>
<p>Former U.S. President Bill Clinton believes that the Republican Party, at the moment is away from power, trying to hinder the work of the current president of the United States Barack Obama. In his Internet blog Clinton called this process &#8220;right-wing conspiracy.&#8221; Recall that the same term used Hillary Clinton in order to characterize the scandal, &#8221; Clinton &#8211; Lewinsky. &#8221;</p>
<p>Bill Clinton believes that the current &#8220;conspiracy&#8221; is not too strong but still noticeable to the American leader, who has just started to really run the country.</p>
<p>Recently, the U.S. intensified conservatives (republicans) who spend numerous protests against the policies of Barack Obama: Their criticism comes in nonperception social policy of the American leader, inappropriate (in their opinion) a waste of budgetary funds for social programs, as well as the proposed health care reform. Most mass rally Republicans called the March on Washington taxpayers, &#8220;which took place on 12 September and had about a few million members across the country.</p>
<p>Regardless of such manifestations of popular unrest (organized Republicans), Clinton believes that the situation for Barack Obama poses no threat and is only reaktsionistskimi sentiments Party, which had lost power in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/bill-clinton-believes-in-the-existence-of-a-conspiracy-against-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO reconsider the assessment of the situation with the defense after a U.S. refusal to deploy interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.
&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.</p>
<p>&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday evening, the Americans informed representatives of the other 27 countries &#8211; members of the alliance about change of Washington&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Alliance does not start from scratch &#8220;, &#8211; said Dzh.Appaturay. According to him, &#8220;parallel with the American plans toward NATO, was its own work on this topic. But we must take into account these new circumstances.&#8221;</p>
<p>Project location of the third position area of strategic missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic formally has no relation to NATO. Washington negotiated with each of these countries on a bilateral basis and only informed the other Allies. However, NATO is on this basis, based its long-term plans, including in matters of European tactical missile defense with Russia and a joint theater missile defense.</p>
<p>The American delegation arrived in Brussels to brief NATO Council&#8217;s decision in Washington not to deploy 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and radar in the Czech Republic.</p>
<p>As noted Dzh.Appaturay, NATO Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen welcomed the U.S. intention to connect all the countries of the alliance for a future debate about missile defense in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States will promote democracy in Myanmar through direct contacts with the military junta.</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-will-promote-democracy-in-myanmar-through-direct-contacts-with-the-military-junta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-will-promote-democracy-in-myanmar-through-direct-contacts-with-the-military-junta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[United States decided to work directly with the authorities of Myanmar to promote democratic reforms in the country, announced U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She clarified that the sanctions against the military regime of Myanmar will be lifted, but Washington will rely on direct contacts with the junta.
&#8220;We believe that sanctions remain an important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United States decided to work directly with the authorities of Myanmar to promote democratic reforms in the country, announced U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She clarified that the sanctions against the military regime of Myanmar will be lifted, but Washington will rely on direct contacts with the junta.</p>
<p>&#8220;We believe that sanctions remain an important part of our policy, but by themselves they do not bring the results we had hoped for the people of Burma&#8221;, &#8211; said Clinton, whose words lead Associated Press.</p>
<p>The decision to establish direct contacts with the Myanmar authorities agreed on the review of U.S. policy toward that country, who ordered a Barack Obama since joining the White House. Previous administration largely relied on the method of the sanctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-will-promote-democracy-in-myanmar-through-direct-contacts-with-the-military-junta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama announced the priorities of U.S. policy and objectives of the world</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/obama-announced-the-priorities-of-u-s-policy-and-objectives-of-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/obama-announced-the-priorities-of-u-s-policy-and-objectives-of-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, speaking before the UN General Assembly, U.S. President Barack Obama called the world leaders to unite and contribute for solving global problems for the benefit of security and prosperity, and not to wait until America will do this alone.
&#8220;The peoples of the world want changing&#8221; &#8211; said Obama during his first address to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, speaking before the UN General Assembly, U.S. President Barack Obama called the world leaders to unite and contribute for solving global problems for the benefit of security and prosperity, and not to wait until America will do this alone.</p>
<p>&#8220;The peoples of the world want changing&#8221; &#8211; said Obama during his first address to the UN General Assembly. &#8211; They will not long tolerate with those who do not accept the lessons of history. &#8221;</p>
<p>In an era where rapidly developing technologies connects people across borders and demolish the old distinctions, Obama called to begin &#8220;a new era of cooperation based on mutual interest and mutual respect.&#8221;</p>
<p>The head of the United States said that he would never apologize for defending the interests of the United States. But he tries to dispel what he said, is &#8220;almost reflexive anti-Americanism&#8221;, diverges from across the world.</p>
<p>Obama has presented a list of policy changes and the real actions that his administration has taken the first nine months in office. The main idea of such transformations &#8211; the United States has no interest to occupy an isolated position, instead they want to act on the world stage as equal partners.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those who are accustomed to blame America, because it acts in the world, can not now stand by and wait for America to deal with world problems alone,&#8221; -said Obama in his speech. &#8211; It&#8217;s time for the whole world to move in new direction. Our work must begin now. &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In an era when the fate becoming general, the power is no longer a zero-sum game&#8221; &#8211; said Obama. &#8211; The one world order, which raises some countries or groups of people over others, can no longer be successful. And America wants a new future &#8220;, &#8211; he continued.</p>
<p>Then in his speech the U.S. president has outlined the main challenges facing humanity in the near future.</p>
<p>Obama called the leaders of all countries to help achieve a nuclear-free world, to improve security and eliminate terrorism, in promoting peace between Israelis and Palestinians in the fight against climate change and create greater economic opportunity.</p>
<p>He said that Iran and North Korea &#8220;should be held accountable&#8221; if they continue to develop its nuclear weapons contrary to international security.</p>
<p>&#8220;The world must unite to demonstrate that international law &#8211; is not an empty promise and that the contracts will be respected,&#8221; &#8211; said the head of the White House.</p>
<p>He said that the doors are open to Pyongyang and Tehran, but U.S. patience is not unlimited.</p>
<p>Speaking of global warming on the planet, the U.S. leader said: &#8220;We can not deny the dangers posed by climate change and our responsibility in overcoming them is urgent. That is why the days when America was delayed by a decision of this question have ended.&#8221;</p>
<p>In his speech at the UN General Assembly, President Obama recalled and that the time has come for the resumption of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians without any preconditions.</p>
<p>Obama called on Palestinians to stop incitement against Israel, but said that the U.S. does not intend to recognize the legitimacy of the ongoing construction of Israeli settlements.</p>
<p>He stressed that the goal is two states living side by side in peace and security &#8211; with the Jewish state genuine security for all Israelis and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on contiguous territory that will end the occupation that began in 1967, and realizes the potential of the Palestinian people. Just as we pursue this goal, we will strive for peace between Israel and Lebanon, Israel and Syria, and to the wider world of Israel from its neighbors. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/obama-announced-the-priorities-of-u-s-policy-and-objectives-of-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition of Georgia: Saakashvili must take into account non-confrontational U.S. policy</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.
&#8220;The leading U.S. foreign policy will be non-confrontational politics, and it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.</p>
<p>&#8220;The leading U.S. foreign policy will be non-confrontational politics, and it is very important for such a conflict in the region, which is Georgia. Naturally, the authorities of Georgia and the first person in the country should pay serious attention to it &#8220;, &#8211; said the leader of the parliamentary minority of Georgia Giorgi Targamadze, said the correspondent of Rosbalt.</p>
<p>&#8220;President Obama is sent from the rostrum of the UN is very important political message around the world and especially Russia&#8221;, &#8211; added the chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Relations Akaki Minashvili. That is, he explained, the U.S. president made it clear that &#8220;now is not the time for which there may be a balance of power&#8221; and that &#8220;should not exist the state, ruling over a small country&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
