<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Noagenda &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noagenda.org/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noagenda.org</link>
	<description>U.S. policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>United States is going to defend Central Asia</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.<br />
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of foreign countries.</p>
<p>According to the preliminary plan, in each of the countries of Central Asia will be deployed unit 3rd Special Forces Group USA, which is based in North Carolina.</p>
<p>&#8220;3rd Special Forces Group will continue to carry out operations in Afghanistan and will be ready to provide assistance in training military personnel of Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, as requested by the head of U.S. Central Command,&#8221; &#8211; said in an interview with EurasiaNet, representative of the command Special Forces Lieutenant Commander Fred Kübler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO reconsider the assessment of the situation with the defense after a U.S. refusal to deploy interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.
&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.</p>
<p>&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday evening, the Americans informed representatives of the other 27 countries &#8211; members of the alliance about change of Washington&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Alliance does not start from scratch &#8220;, &#8211; said Dzh.Appaturay. According to him, &#8220;parallel with the American plans toward NATO, was its own work on this topic. But we must take into account these new circumstances.&#8221;</p>
<p>Project location of the third position area of strategic missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic formally has no relation to NATO. Washington negotiated with each of these countries on a bilateral basis and only informed the other Allies. However, NATO is on this basis, based its long-term plans, including in matters of European tactical missile defense with Russia and a joint theater missile defense.</p>
<p>The American delegation arrived in Brussels to brief NATO Council&#8217;s decision in Washington not to deploy 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and radar in the Czech Republic.</p>
<p>As noted Dzh.Appaturay, NATO Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen welcomed the U.S. intention to connect all the countries of the alliance for a future debate about missile defense in Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition of Georgia: Saakashvili must take into account non-confrontational U.S. policy</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.
&#8220;The leading U.S. foreign policy will be non-confrontational politics, and it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.</p>
<p>&#8220;The leading U.S. foreign policy will be non-confrontational politics, and it is very important for such a conflict in the region, which is Georgia. Naturally, the authorities of Georgia and the first person in the country should pay serious attention to it &#8220;, &#8211; said the leader of the parliamentary minority of Georgia Giorgi Targamadze, said the correspondent of Rosbalt.</p>
<p>&#8220;President Obama is sent from the rostrum of the UN is very important political message around the world and especially Russia&#8221;, &#8211; added the chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Relations Akaki Minashvili. That is, he explained, the U.S. president made it clear that &#8220;now is not the time for which there may be a balance of power&#8221; and that &#8220;should not exist the state, ruling over a small country&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
