<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Noagenda &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noagenda.org/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noagenda.org</link>
	<description>U.S. policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s jobs bill failed in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2011/09/28/obamas-jobs-bill-failed-in-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2011/09/28/obamas-jobs-bill-failed-in-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama&#8217;s package of bills on the creation of new jobs failed on Monday when the chief lawmaker of the Republican Party said that the board members could allocate only a part of the required 447 billion dollars.
When Obama began to insist that lawmakers voted for the bill, Rep. Eric Cantor, № 2 of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s package of bills on the creation of new jobs failed on Monday when the chief lawmaker of the Republican Party said that the board members could allocate only a part of the required 447 billion dollars.</p>
<p>When Obama began to insist that lawmakers voted for the bill, Rep. Eric Cantor, № 2 of the Republican Party in the House of Representatives, said that this would not happen.<br />
<span id="more-30"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2011/09/28/obamas-jobs-bill-failed-in-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States is going to defend Central Asia</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pentagon is developing plans to deploy special forces units in a number of Central Asian states.<br />
As reports Lenta.ru with reference to the portal EurasiaNet, it comes to preparing for the worsening situation in the region, where a NATO campaign in Afghanistan. Future of U.S. Special Forces mission is formulated as providing &#8220;internal defense of foreign countries.<br />
<span id="more-13"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/united-states-is-going-to-defend-central-asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO reconsider the assessment of the situation with the defense after a U.S. refusal to deploy interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.
&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NATO will examine the consequences of refusal from the U.S. to deploy elements of its strategic missile defense system in Central Europe, said on Thursday the representative of the alliance, James Appathurai.</p>
<p>&#8220;NATO will reconsider its entire analysis of the situation with missile defense,&#8221; &#8211; he said after a meeting of the NATO Council, on Thursday evening, the Americans informed representatives of the other 27 countries &#8211; members of the alliance about change of Washington&#8217;s position.<br />
<span id="more-9"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/nato-reconsider-the-assessment-of-the-situation-with-the-defense-after-a-u-s-refusal-to-deploy-interceptors-and-radar-in-poland-and-the-czech-republic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition of Georgia: Saakashvili must take into account non-confrontational U.S. policy</title>
		<link>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noagenda.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgian politicians and experts believe that in Obama&#8217;s speech at a meeting of the UN General Assembly contained clear messages of peace and, in particular, Russia. However, in a speech the U.S. president sounded what should be taken into account Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili.<br />
<span id="more-3"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noagenda.org/2009/09/30/opposition-of-georgia-saakashvili-must-take-into-account-non-confrontational-u-s-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

